page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5
page 6
page 7
page 8
page 9
page 10
page 11
page 12
page 13
page 14
page 15
page 16
page 17
page 18
page 19
page 20
page 21
page 22
page 23
page 24
page 25
page 26
page 27
page 28
page 29
page 30
page 31
page 32
page 33
page 34
page 35
page 36
page 37
page 38
page 39
page 40
page 41
page 42
page 43
page 44
page 45
page 46
page 47
page 48
page 49
page 50
page 51
page 52
page 53
page 54
page 55
page 56
page 57
page 58 page 59
page 60
page 61
page 62
page 63
page 64
page 65
page 66
page 67
page 68
page 69
page 70
page 71
page 72
page 73
page 74
page 75
page 76
page 77
page 78
page 79
page 80
page 81
page 82
page 83
page 84
page 85
page 86
page 87
page 88
page 89
page 90
page 91
page 92
page 93
page 94
page 95
page 96
page 97
page 98
page 99
page 100
page 101
page 102
page 103
page 104
page 105
page 106
page 107
page 108
page 109
page 110
page 111
page 112
page 113
page 114
page 115
page 116
page 117
page 118
page 119
page 120
page 121
page 122
page 123
page 124
page 125
page 126
page 127
page 128
page 129
page 130
page 131
page 132
page 133
page 134
page 135
page 136
page 137
page 138
page 139
page 140
page 141
page 142
page 143
page 144
page 145
page 146
page 147
page 148
page 149
page 150
page 151
page 152
page 153
page 154
page 155
page 156
page 157
page 158
page 159
page 160
page 161
page 162
page 163
page 164
page 165
page 166
page 167
page 168
page 169
page 170
page 171
page 172
page 173
page 174
page 175
page 176
page 177
page 178
page 179
page 180
page 181
page 182
page 183
page 184
page 185
< prev - next > Energy Hydro power civil_works_guidelines_for_micro_hydro (Printable PDF)
56 CIVIL WORKS GUIDELINES FOR MICRO-HYDROPOWER IN NEPAL
Photo 4.14 Jhankre mini-hydro penstock crossing, Dolakha,
Nepal.
Photo 4.15 Jhankre mini-hydro headrace crossing Ghandruk, Nepal.
siphons are pipes that are buried across the gully. They traverse
down to the lowest point of the gully and then come up at the
other side (hence the name inverted siphon). As long as there
is sufficient head and the pipe is below the hydraulic grade
line, the flow can be conveyed through such siphons. A flush
out valve must be incorporated at the low point of the siphon
(since sediment can be deposited at the low point). Such
siphons can also reduce costs of crossings as well as risks due
possible damages from floods. Sufficient protection against
scour and damages due to rolling boulders should be provided
for inverted siphons. This can be achieved by encasing the
pipe in concrete (generally nominally reinforced) along with
stone pitching on the top of the pipe as shown in Figure 4.8.
Inverted siphons across larger streams will also require some
bank protection structures based on site conditions. A typical
section of an inverted siphon under a stream or a gulley is
shown in Figure 4.8.
4.6 Headrace pipe
4.6.1 GENERAL
Pipes may be required along the headrace alignment where slopes
are unstable and where landslides may occur. Although masonry
and concrete canals can minimise seepage induced landslides,
they are rigid structures and in the event of slope failures, such
canals can be swept away. These canals will also crack if there are
small slope movements. Where soil instability problems are
expected, flexible pipes may be an appropriate solution provided
that the required pipe length is not too long (see Box 4.6). Another
case for the use of flexible pipes is when the entire hillside is
slowly sliding (i.e. mass movement is occurring) and part of the
headrace alignment needs to traverse it.
In Nepal HDPE pipes are often used to address the above
problems. These pipes are flexible enough to accommodate
some ground movement and can be joined by heat welding,
which is described in Box 4.7. HDPE pipes should be buried
to protect them from sunlight, cattle and vandalism.
The reason why PVC pipes have not been used for headrace in
Nepal is because although they are easy to join (with a PVC
cement solution), they are also very rigid. Therefore, they
cannot accommodate ground movement.
Appendix B includes data on standard pipe sizes available in
Nepal.
4.6.2 DESIGN CRITERIA
The design criteria for headrace pipes are similar to those of
headrace canals. Specifically, the design should address the
following issues:
The pipe diameter should be such that for the ground slope
of the alignment, it should be able to convey the design
flow. If there is a possibility of flood flows entering into the
pipe, make provision for spilling such excess flows.
The inlet to each section of headrace pipe should be
protected with a trashrack, so that debris does not get in
and block the pipe. The spacing of the trashrack bars should
be no more than one third of the pipe diameter, and the
velocity through the trashrack should not exceed 1 m/s.
Where a section of headrace pipe ends in an unlined canal,
a masonry transition structure is recommended, to avoid
scour by the high velocity flow.
Headrace pipes are efficient when they are flowing full,
but if the head on the pipe exceeds the rated pipe head (i.e.
allowable head on the pipe) break pressure tanks need to be
provided. Such tanks dissipate the head over the pipe and
avoid the need to use a higher pipe rating. However, in
practice, repeated use of break pressure tanks has sometimes
induced cyclic surge (i.e. periodic change in head and hence
the flow). Another option in such cases is to select a larger
pipe diameter such that open flow condition prevails. Break
pressure tanks should be provided with lockable covers, so